Too bad your cellmate's still going to call you 'Honey'.
Bruce Campbell Online
8-Bit Theater
Zach Everson ... He's a funny motherscratcher.
The Talamasca 2
T-Shirt Hell ... The place your mother warned you about.
Vote for me on the Top 150 Comic sites!
The Brad Douriff Interview Get Joe in Episode III! Bring The Tick to Video and DVD! Click Here!

Resident DVDvil :: Dawn of the Dead: Director's Uncut Version

 

[ Rants ]
Monday, October 25, 2004
 

I think it’s safe to say that most people have fears. Some have them to the point of extreme, and I guess these could be referred to as phobias. More often than not, these fears are about tangible things like heights, enclosed spaces, snakes, or spiders. Then there are those of us who have irrational fears. We fear things that will never, ever happen. I’m going to confess to having one of those fears, and up until this point I’ve only admitted it to my wife. I have an irrational fear of being attacked and eaten by the undead.

On the surface, this might seem silly, but let me tell you there are times when I find myself driving down country roads in the middle of the night and in my mind’s eye I can see zombies shambling up from the sides of the road. I even start making conscious decisions of what I would do if they in fact DID start shambling towards me. (Speeding up comes to mind…). Sometimes, when I get up in the middle of the night to get a bottle for the baby, I look out through our sliding glass doors to the field behind the house and again, my imagination runs a bit wild.

Now, I realize I will never have to deal with real zombies, shambling or otherwise, so the fear does not get so bad as to lose sleep or hide under the bed. Though I will admit to locking the bedroom door from time to time, but this is more to give would be robbers a harder time getting in while I’m sleeping (uh-huh, sure…). The really funny thing is how I’ve dealt with this irrational fear over the years. First and foremost is that I watch any movies that I can on the subject (this way I can learn what to do and what not to do to survive a zombie attack), and have spent a good number of years working as an effects artist in the haunted house business. Yep, that’s right. I surround myself with all manner of creatures, monsters and zombies on nearly a daily basis. Go figure. Of course, if any of the guys I work with read this review and learn of my fear, my life will become a living hell. (So, if any of you ARE reading this, I’m just making it up for the sake of this review.)

What all of this has to do with the new DVD release of Universal’s brand-spanking new remake of “Dawn of the Dead” is that by writing about this, it not only allows me a cathartic release of this otherwise secret fear but lets you know that I’m somewhat of an expert on the subject of the undead. And because I have been a longtime fan of the work of George Romero, I was amongst the many who were not thrilled with the idea that someone had the nerve to try and remake his 1978 classic.

Romero’s ‘Dead” trilogy still stands as one of the best series of its kind, and makes Romero the undisputed king of horror film fans everywhere. The original 1968 release of “Night of the Living Dead” was a groundbreaking film for the horror genre in that it not only pushed the envelope of what could be shown on camera, but also refrained from having the typical Hollywood ending where the ‘good guys’ win. For the time it was made, it was considered shocking and horrific, and in spite of its age and low budget status still gives some people the willies even to this day. Even more shocking to audiences at the time was it had an African American as the main lead. Long thought to be a bit of a social commentary on Romero’s part, he still claims that he chose the actor for no other reason than he was the best actor he had at the time.

(If I can share another little personal side note, I was into the haunted house thing even back then while in high school. I went to the premiere with a friend, both of us dressed up as zombies. We sat outside the theatre box office and fought over and chewed on a couple of fake arms that had been filled with chopped up hot dogs and ketchup. The theatre manager loved it, some of the patrons… didn’t. We of course went into the theatre a little later and watched the movie, much to the discomfort of the couple we sat next to.)

My point is that when I first heard that ex-Troma screenwriter James Gunn was going to tackle a re-write to be helmed by newbie director Zack Snyder, I was incensed almost to the point of outrage for what I thought was good reason. I couldn’t figure out why the studio would pour so much money into a couple of relative newcomers instead of funding Romero to make a much desired fourth installment to his ‘Dead’ series.

I started scouring the Internet for news about the film, and everything I read just made it sound like it could actually be a pretty good remake. I quickly learned never to read online forums, because there wasn’t any kind of intelligent discourse going on about the film. Fans were outraged, but offered very except for non-productive, expletive enhanced comments. So I started checking out the some of the news sources and Internet rumor mills and started to hear things that changed my attitude. At least a little bit.

News of actors started wafting my way and I was intrigued by the casting of Sarah Polley, who has had a long and impressive career in and out of the indie market. When I heard about Jake Weber (whom I first saw in TV’s “American Gothic”), I was even more interested because I had always considered him to be a highly underrated actor and was curious to see what he would add to the mix. The addition of Ving Rhames pretty much clinched it for me. Rhames is a surprisingly versatile actor, whose presence seems to instantly elevate any cast that he joins.

Once I decided that I had to at least give the film a chance, I patiently waited for its theatrical release. Then the announcement was made that the USA Network was going to air the first 10 minutes of the new “Dawn of the Dead”, completely unedited, 1 week before it opened. Supposedly those first few minutes were scary enough to convince people to go see it. Needless to say, my wife and I were on the couch and ready to watch when the time came. We shut off the lights and settled in.

Let me say, that not only did those first 10 minutes scare the crap out of me, but the images stayed with me for the rest of the week and heightened my already highly irrational fear. For days, if I got up in the middle of the night for that drink I didn’t dare look out the sliding glass door. I had gone from knowing full well that nothing would be out there to only being fairly sure nothing would be. That first section of the movie also involved a little girl, which you’ll know if you’ve seen the trailers, and every time I got up, I found that I was bracing myself in case I saw her in the house. Those first few minutes just wriggled right into my imagination and wouldn’t let go.

Part of the reason I feel that it affected me so strongly is because of the only improvement that Snyder made over Romero’s version. In the original, most of the sets outside of the mall, pretty much looked like sets. Or they took place in areas that weren’t familiar surroundings to me. (TV stations, tenement apartments, etc…) This new version took this irrational fear I have and placed it right smack dab in the middle of my neighborhood. The house and the suburb could have been right around the corner from me. I was given a look at what it might be like to have this happen in MY world, and it shook me up.

Was I ready to see the film in theatres? Uhhh… absolutely. Did the rest of the new “Dawn of the Dead” live up to that opening sequence? I’d have to say… mostly. My final impression of the film was kind of a mixed bag. There were a few things I didn’t care for in the movie, but I was surprised to see a lot that I loved about it. The acting throughout the film was consistently great, and the scares came fast and furious. I jumped quite a number of times, even during my second viewing of the DVD recently. The blood and gore was very well done, and the filmmakers were able to give us a lot of it without ever really going over the top. The zombies themselves looked great, and I was glad to see that they opted to use more traditional forms of makeup effects without relying totally on CGI.

Speaking of the zombies, they were the catalyst for a lot of Internet jabbering because of the fact that they didn’t move the way traditional horror movie zombies moved. They ran and jumped like Olympic hopefuls. A lot of horror fans didn’t like this because it made them more like a bunch of rabid people running around (similar to “28 Days”), not the undead. I lost count of all the messages I read about how it was a horrible decision to make the zombies move so quickly. Fans were really up in arms about it. Of course, I have a theory about this.

Most horror fans (at least the ones I know) occasionally imagine what they would do if this ever really happened. Usually they imagine it like a video game where you take out a bunch of zombies before they can get you. Slow-moving zombies are a little less threatening because they are easier to get away from or fight (unless there's a horde) allowing you a better chance at escape. On the other hand, fast moving-ones are more threatening because they are likely to catch and eat you. Though they won’t admit it, I feel that it’s this difference that fuels the debate. (Granted, this isn’t the only reason but it is one that I think exists). Personally I feel threatened by both and imagine that I would curl up into a fetal position and suck my thumb if I ever saw either. In the world of cinema however, I do have to admit preferring the slow-moving ones because they are so much creepier.

I also liked the fact that the new “Dawn of the Dead” went beyond being just a scary movie. It actually ventured into the realm of ‘action’, with the various attempts at rescue and escape.

On the ‘not so good’ side, I had a few personal issues with the plotline involving a pregnant woman. The outcome was very effective, but a bit unsettling because my wife and I had just had a baby girl. In retrospect, I think that was really the only thing I didn’t like.

In picking up the new DVD of “Dawn of the Dead”, you are offered the choice of buying the ‘R’ rated version or the ‘Unrated.’ I have the ‘Unrated’ and it does offer up a slightly longer version of the film with a little bit more gore (as well as some interesting character development) for your money. There are also quite a few extra features that make the disc well worth adding to your collection.

First up is a video introduction to he movie by Snyder, and while he gives you a good idea of what was added to this version of the film, he does come off seeming a little goofy (he just may have been nervous in front of the camera). He and producer Eric Newman then team up for a very lively and entertaining commentary for the movie. Then there are a couple of strange little video bits that were put together for the disc. The first one features actor Bruce Bohne, reprising his role as the gun shop owner Andy. In the film, he strikes up a friendship with the people in the mall, communicating only by marker board as he is trapped in his shop down the street. Here, there is a video diary of what was taking place in the shop. It’s kind if interesting, if not a little bit poignant, but his acting was a little bit stilted and made the whole thing a little less than believable. That is the same problem that plagues the fake news ‘Special Report’ featurette.

The DVD does have a handful of deleted scenes which I have a habit of skipping. These particular scenes were worth a look though. For the makeup lover, there are three featurettes that focus on how some of the zombie ‘head shots’ were pulled off, a few of the attack sequences, and what it took to transform the huge multitude of extras into an army of zombies

This new remake of “Dawn of the Dead” really surprised me in that it was a very well-made and well-thought out film. It was funny, scary, gross, disgusting and even action-packed. My only wish is that the filmmakers had opted not to use the title “Dawn of the Dead”, however. The movie was good enough to stand on its own and didn’t need to ride the coattails of Romero’s fame.

Directed by: Zack Snyder
Starring: Sarah Polley, Ving Rhames, Jake Weber, Mekhi Phifer
Extras: “Splitting Headaches: Anatomy of Exploding Heads”, “Attack of the Living Dead”, “Raising the Dead”, “The Lost Tape”, “Special Report: Zombie Invasion”, Deleted Scenes, Commentary by Director Zack Snyder and Producer Eric Newman
Specifications: Widescreen (2.35:1), Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround Sound
Studio: Universal
Release Date: 10/26/2004
Region 1
MPAA Rating: NR
Website
Website

We'll give Dawn of the Dead: Director's Uncut Version an A.

[ Back ]
All text, images, and other content © 2002 LethalDeath.com unless otherwise noted.
Questions, comments? Send 'em here.
Get hosted with eHostingBiz